Archive for February, 2011

What Supreme Court Justices Do

February 28, 2011
By Woodruff

The http://www.manhattan-institute.org/video/?c=101310MI has posted a speech by Justice Samuel Alito. He discusses the proper role of judges.
Read more »

Tags:
Posted in Trial Advocacy | No Comments »

Dumb Laws

February 23, 2011
By Woodruff


Read more »

Tags:
Posted in Legal Research | No Comments »

Motions for Summary Judgment

February 21, 2011
By Woodruff

Prof. Bradley Shannon has done a great job of covering civil procedure in his scholarship. His articles on Motions for Summary Judgment are well worth your time to read. They are short and stay on topic. He also has a great article on pleadings following the Twombly and Iqbal decisions by the Supreme Court.
Read more »

Tags: ,
Posted in Civil Procedure, Trial Advocacy | No Comments »

Funny Lawyer Commercials

February 17, 2011
By Woodruff

Lawyer advertising can provide hours of entertainment. Really, it can. One of these is fake, the other real.
Read more »

Tags:
Posted in Legal Humor, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Incomprehensible

February 14, 2011
By Woodruff

Judges and their staffs deal with immense case loads. Knowing this, you should always be mindful of their time when preparing motions. Always proofread your motions for both grammar and content before submitting them to the court. Otherwise, you might get an order from the court quoting a rather insulting line from a very...
Read more »

Tags:
Posted in Legal Humor, Legal Writing | No Comments »

Orthogonal

February 7, 2011
By Woodruff

Sometimes lawyers can get carried away with words. This appears to have been the case during oral arguments in Briscoe v. Virginia. MR. FRIEDMAN: I think that issue is entirely orthogonal to the issue here because the Commonwealth is acknowledging - CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I’m sorry. Entirely what? MR. FRIEDMAN: Orthogonal. Right angle. Unrelated....
Read more »

Tags:
Posted in Legal Writing, Trial Advocacy | No Comments »

Downgrading from a Porsche to a BMW is not a changed circumstance?

February 2, 2011
By Woodruff
Downgrading from a Porsche to a BMW is not a changed circumstance?

According to a court in New Jersey, downgrading from a Porsche to a BMW did not constitute evidence of a change in living circumstances for one litigant. Pages 3 and 13 make reference to the recent automobile hardships suffered by the lawyer defendant in this family law case. As anyone familiar with German cars...
Read more »

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »


Swellinfo surf forecasts