<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Art of Litigation &#187; Oral Argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theartoflitigation.com/tag/oral-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theartoflitigation.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 19:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Moot Court</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/moot-court/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/moot-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moot court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GALrNK6Kk3o" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/moot-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Orthogonal</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/449/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/449/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 14:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Argument]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes lawyers can get carried away with words. This appears to have been the case during oral arguments in Briscoe v. Virginia. MR. FRIEDMAN: I think that issue is entirely orthogonal to the issue here because the Commonwealth is acknowledging - CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I’m sorry. Entirely what? MR. FRIEDMAN: Orthogonal. Right angle. Unrelated. Irrelevant. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes lawyers can get carried away with words. This appears to have been the case during oral arguments in <em>Briscoe v. Virginia. </em></p>
<p>MR. FRIEDMAN: I think that issue is entirely orthogonal to the issue here because the Commonwealth is acknowledging -<br />
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I’m sorry. Entirely what?<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: Orthogonal. Right angle. Unrelated. Irrelevant.<br />
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Oh.<br />
JUSTICE SCALIA: What was that adjective? I liked that.<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: Orthogonal.<br />
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Orthogonal.<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: Right, right.<br />
JUSTICE SCALIA: Orthogonal, ooh.<br />
(Laughter.)<br />
JUSTICE KENNEDY: I knew this case presented us a problem.<br />
(Laughter.)<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: I should have — I probably should have said -<br />
JUSTICE SCALIA: I think we should use that in the opinion.<br />
(Laughter.)<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: I thought — I thought I had seen it before.<br />
JUSTICE SCALIA: Or the dissent.<br />
(Laughter.)<br />
MR. FRIEDMAN: That is a bit of professorship creeping in, I suppose.</p>
<p><a href="http://volokh.com/2010/01/11/orthogonal-ooh/">H/T: Orin Kerr at The Volokh Conspiracy </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/449/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look to Hollywood and Madison Avenue for Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/look-to-hollywood-and-madison-avenue-for-inspiration/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/look-to-hollywood-and-madison-avenue-for-inspiration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[themes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the key components to a good case is a theme. The theme should speak to the judge or jury. It does not need to be long or complicated, a simple sentence works best. For example, everyone remembers Johnnie Cochran&#8217;s &#8220;if it doesn&#8217;t fit, you must acquit.&#8221; If you are not creative, or have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theartoflitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/draper-e1277761365273.jpg"><img src="http://theartoflitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/draper-e1277761365273.jpg" alt="" title="draper" width="250" height="200" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-275" /></a>One of the key components to a good case is a theme. The theme should speak to the judge or jury. It does not need to be long or complicated, a simple sentence works best. For example, everyone remembers Johnnie Cochran&#8217;s &#8220;if it doesn&#8217;t fit, you must acquit.&#8221;  </p>
<p>If you are not creative, or have hit a wall in the creative process, look to Hollywood and Madison Avenue for inspiration. Billions of dollars are spent by the movie and advertising industries to create messages used to sell stories and products. Watch television commercials, successful movies, and advertisements to help get the creative juices flowing. You might even find your theme. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/look-to-hollywood-and-madison-avenue-for-inspiration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Famous Trials</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/famous-trials/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/famous-trials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 22:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persuasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voir dire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Douglas Linder at the University of Missouri &#8211; Kansas City School of Law has created a webpage of famous trials. It contains transcripts, biographies, and other information. The earliest trial included is that of Socrates (399 B.C.). The most recent trial covered is the prosecution of Moussauri in 2006. It is a great source of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://theartoflitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dood_van_socrates_jacques-louis_david.jpeg"><img src="http://theartoflitigation.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/dood_van_socrates_jacques-louis_david-225x300.jpg" alt="" title="dood_van_socrates_jacques-louis_david" width="225" height="300" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-270" /></a>Douglas Linder at the University of Missouri &#8211; Kansas City School of Law has created a webpage of famous trials. It contains transcripts, biographies, and other information. The earliest trial included is that of Socrates (399 B.C.).  The most recent trial covered is the prosecution of Moussauri in 2006. It is a great source of information.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/ftrials.htm">Famous Trials.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/famous-trials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Seventh Circuit Oral Argument</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/poor-seventh-circuit-oral-argument/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/poor-seventh-circuit-oral-argument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oral Argument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seventh Circuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c8ksvG_X4Z4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c8ksvG_X4Z4&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/poor-seventh-circuit-oral-argument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

