<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Art of Litigation &#187; Profession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theartoflitigation.com/tag/profession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theartoflitigation.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:30:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Changing Legal Profession</title>
		<link>http://theartoflitigation.com/the-changing-legal-profession/</link>
		<comments>http://theartoflitigation.com/the-changing-legal-profession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 17:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Woodruff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Trial Advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theartoflitigation.com/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more things change, the more they stay the same. For example, take this 1919 passage from The Art of Cross-Examination. It could be written today. Remove the dates and change the numbers of cases handled by the courts and you have a passage that describes the present state of the profession. I am aware [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more things change, the more they stay the same. For example, take this 1919 passage from The Art of Cross-Examination. It could be written today. Remove the dates and change the numbers of cases handled by the courts and you have a passage that describes the present state of the profession. </p>
<blockquote><p>I am aware that many members of my profession still sneer at<br />
trial by jury. Such men, however, when not among the<br />
unsuccessful and disgruntled, will, with but few exceptions,<br />
be found to have had but little practice themselves in court, or<br />
else to belong to that ever growing class in our profession who<br />
have relinquished their court practice and are building up<br />
fortunes such as were never dreamed of in the legal<br />
profession a decade ago, by becoming what may be styled<br />
business lawyers men who are learned in the law as a<br />
profession, but who through opportunity, combined with rare<br />
commercial ability, have come to apply their learning especially<br />
their knowledge of corporate law to great commercial<br />
enterprises, combinations, organizations, and reorganizations,<br />
and have thus come to practise law as a business.</p>
<p>To such as these a book of this nature can have but little<br />
interest. It is to those who by choice or chance are, or intend<br />
to become, engaged in that most laborious of all forms of legal<br />
business, the trial of cases in court, that the suggestions and<br />
experiences which follow are especially addressed.<br />
It is often truly said that many of our best lawyers I am<br />
speaking now especially of New York City are withdrawing<br />
from court practice because the nature of the litigation is<br />
changing. To such an extent is this change taking place in<br />
some localities that the more important commercial cases rarely<br />
reach a court decision. Our merchants prefer to compromise<br />
their difficulties, or to write off their losses, rather than enter<br />
into litigations that must remain dormant in the courts for<br />
upward of three years awaiting their turn for a hearing on the<br />
overcrowded court calendars. And yet fully six thousand<br />
cases of one kind or another are tried or disposed of yearly in<br />
the Borough of Manhattan alone.</p>
<p>This congestion is not wholly due to lack of judges, or that<br />
they are not capable and industrious men; but is largely, it<br />
seems to me, the fault of the system in vogue in all our<br />
American courts of allowing any lawyer, duly enrolled as a<br />
member of the Bar, to practise in the highest courts. In the<br />
United States we recognize no distinction between barrister<br />
and solicitor; we are all barristers and solicitors by turn. One<br />
has but to frequent the courts to become convinced that, so<br />
long as the ten thousand members at the New York County<br />
Bar all avail themselves of their privilege to appear in court and<br />
try their own clients’ cases, the great majority of the trials will<br />
be poorly conducted, and much valuable time wasted.</p></blockquote>
<p>Francis Wellman, The Art of Cross-Examination 6 (1919)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theartoflitigation.com/the-changing-legal-profession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

